Zimbabwe, China strengthen ties
Patent system shake up to boost innovation in SA
Tanzania: Government Moves to Calm Chinese Investors
Somalia: UK Ambassador Presents His Credentials to Somali President
Uganda: President Tells All Telecoms to List on Stock Exchange
Nigeria: PETAN - Nigeria Must Take Advantage of Opportunities in Oil Industry
Nigeria, Japan Sign U.S.$14.2 Million Grant on Disease Diagnostics
Cross continental moves: Sisi's trip to West Africa and the US
IMF projects 2.7 percent growth of Tunisian economy in 2019
The New Times – Rwanda
The largest den of deniers of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi is about to be shaken – really hard. Most are affiliated with the Habyarimana regime and it is therefore not surprising since they are no longer enjoying the trappings of power and all that comes with it.
Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel had some very chilling news tailor-made for them; within one month, their parliament is expected to pass new legislation to criminalise denial of the Genocide against the Tutsi.
Many European countries, especially Belgium, France, and to a lower extent, The Netherlands, have been havens for perpetrators of the Genocide who seem driven by the urge to poison public opinion and drag Rwanda in the mud.
Their main weapon was pushing forward their own narrative, especially through denial, so the Prime Minister’s statement must have put them on panic mode and they are now running in circles.
It will be interesting to see how they will be navigating around the legislation, but make no doubt about it; the hate they carry with them will give them sleepless nights finding means to propagate their crooked narratives.
The Belgian decision should be emulated by other countries in order to completely uproot the Genocide ideology and denial. They could begin by removing from the shelves the many books and other publications written by so-called academics, journalists, researchers and “Rwanda experts”.
Many have never even set foot in Rwanda and rely on perpetrators of the Genocide as their sources of news and research papers. As long as those publications are not removed out of circulation, the poison will continue to linger in the air.
The New Times – Rwanda
By: Moise M. Bahati
“For too long, a sad song has dominated the story of Africa and fueled a relentless, unforgiving Afro-pessimism.” This sentence echoes the belief among African elite and those interested in the continent’s development: Africa has long been reported with bias and stereotypes.
“New News Out of Africa: Uncovering African Renaissance” by the American journalist Charlayne Hunter-Gault is a memoir which blends reporting with analysis of post-colonial Africa, with focus on post-Apartheid South Africa.
It paints a genuine picture of Africa, contrary to the stereotypical way in which the continent has been reported by foreign media. Published in 2006, the book examines the continent’s path to democracy and the hardships it faces in its quest for development.
Half of the book is dedicated to South Africa, where Hunter-Gault lived since 1985 as a PBS reporter, and later, Chief Africa Correspondent for National Public Radio, and Johannesburg Bureau Chief forCNN.
An African American, Hunter-Gault felt connected to black South Africans who were undergoing discrimination and denial of human rights and justice in their own country.
She had experienced similar injustices back in the United States before the end of the civil rights movement in 1968.
Having lived in South Africa during and after Apartheid, Hunter-Gault has seen the country emerge from the white-minority rule to black-majority led democracy. She tells the uniqueness of the new South Africa.
The formerly oppressed black majority has avoided revenge on its former oppressors. Instead, it has enshrined unity and shared interests.
Hunter-Gault, winner of two Peabody awards, acknowledges South Africa, a “young democracy”, is tested like “older” ones. She cites the ousting of then-deputy president Jacob Zuma over allegations of corruption and rape.
She reckons that South Africa will prosper economically if it “succeeds in bringing about economic revolution that shifts control of the economy from the white minority to the black majority”, and hopes this will lead to African renaissance.
Today, white people still own most of the land and wealth, and redistribution is controversial as the government plans expropriation without compensation.
The hope for an African renaissance lies in the optimistic belief that Africa is improving.
Hunter-Gault argues that the African Union—the continental body that, in 2002, replaced the organisation of African Unity whose main purpose was to fight against colonialism—has wider responsibilities.
She appreciates the establishment of the AU which was devoted to solving the problems of insecurity, disease and poverty on the continent.
Until today, however, the cooperation has not yet eradicated these problems. But under its ongoing reforms, the AU seeks to fund its projects, demanding countries to contribute 0.2 per cent levy on imports.
Hunter-Gault argues that Mobutu Sese Seko’s death in 1997 in Zaire (today’s DRC) marked “the beginning of the end of African ‘big man’ rule on the continent and “perhaps the first best chance to change” the established bad governance. However, it is arguable whether that was the beginning of change or just one case in the continuation of bad leadership in the DRC or on the continent.
“New News Out of Africa” also focuses on the development of journalism in Africa, which is struggling to stand on its own feet to report to the world an alternative picture of the continent.
The portrayal by foreign media of a continent where nothing happens, except what Hunter-Gault calls “the four D’s (disease, death, disaster and despair)” has to be challenged.
But journalists, like leaders, have an even bigger task. For journalists, challenging afro-pessimism among both foreigners and disillusioned Africans requires financial resources and skills.
For leaders, it requires good governance that solves the challenges of instability, poverty and unemployment.
The failure of foreign media to give a balanced picture of Africa, Hunter-Gault argues, is a result of ‘parachute journalism’—reporting without background, hence uninformed judgements. She highlights the need to report “in context”, first understanding a country and its history.
While arguing for balance of coverage, she denounces the tendency of journalists to report on wars and suffering: the “shallow coverage of death, disaster, and despair”.
But this will likely raise debate about what is, and what is not, news; what makes news and is worth reporting. Reporting an alternative picture of Africa should not imply ignoring the suffering of people.
Hunter-Gault finds it noteworthy how Rwanda united her citizens after the 1994 Genocide against Tutsi. She recommends the Gacaca courts—that helped prosecute hundreds of thousands of suspected perpetrators—should be an approach to solving problems in post-conflict societies.
Hunter-Gault’s “New News Out of Africa” provides insights, especially for those who want to understand the post-apartheid South Africa and Africa at large on the democratic path before 2006.
It informs readers of the efforts and challenges governments, citizens and journalists face in the ongoing struggle for democratisation of the continent. By writing this book, Hunter-Gault has done her part in confronting Africa’s misrepresentation.
The New Times (Kigali)
By Joan Mbabazi
When some students from Green Hills Academy saw ex-combatants and casualties of Rwanda's liberation war struggling to ride their wheelchairs on a marram road in Nyarugunga Sector which connects to the main tarmac road in Kanombe, they were moved.
They took it upon themselves to inspire the rehabilitation of the road, which is the main link to the homes of the war veterans.
The idea was initiated by five students from the Nyarurutarama-based Green Hills Academy - Cindy Uwase, Divin Lionel Dushimimana, Amri Sued Keisha, Nina Umutesi, and Eva Bigagaza.
They visited the veterans and delivered their wish to rehabilitate the road, which had become dilapidated.
Green Hills students pose with Gaetan Kayitare (in wheelchair), the head of the war veterans in Mukoni, Nyarugunga Sector, Kicukiro District. Joan Mbabazi
The ex-combatants were stunned, wondering where such young people would get the money from, but nonetheless gave the youth the benefit of doubt.
Although the students never had money, they were determined to put a smile on the faces of their heroes.
In November last year, the students pitched their idea to John Kagaba, the head of Mukoni village, Nyarugunga Sector.
"We were ready to render any form support towards the construction of the road that leads to the veteran's homes," Bigagaza, one of the students said.
Kagaba informed them that it has always been his wish to work on that road, but unfortunately he lacked support, she added.
After receiving a nod from the authorities, the students embarked on a fundraising exercise at their school, homes and among friends.
They were able to raise Rwf2 million, which they used to buy pavements. They also mobilised their colleagues to participate in form of providing the needed labour to lay the pavers.
On his part, Kagaba too, managed to secure support from residents of Mukoni, in terms of money, labour, trucks and other construction machines. In total, they raised a combined Rwf6.7 million.
Gaetan Kayitare, the head of war veterans who comprise 16 families, said; "I am more than grateful to see students at just 16 years of age, so committed to see us move easily without straining."
I am assured that the generation we are leaving behind is hardworking and patriotic, he noted.
"They will follow in our footsteps. If young people take part in activities that develop the community, there won't be time for them to engage in useless acts," he said.
He described the move by the students as an act of patriotism, which young and old people alike should emulate.